Qualitative and Quantitative Methods for Industrial Analytics
Syllabus, Master's level, 1TS317
- Code
- 1TS317
- Education cycle
- Second cycle
- Main field(s) of study and in-depth level
- Industrial Engineering and Management A1F
- Grading system
- Fail (U), Pass (3), Pass with credit (4), Pass with distinction (5)
- Finalised by
- The Faculty Board of Science and Technology, 2 March 2021
- Responsible department
- Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering
Entry requirements
180 credits including 20 credits in industrial engineering and management at Master's level. Proficiency in English equivalent to the Swedish upper secondary course English 6.
Learning outcomes
On completion of the course the student shall be able to
- identify and explain basic scientific theoretical points of departure, relevant for scientific work within industrial technology,
- relate different methodological approaches to each other, and describe their benefits and limitations,
- assess and critically review scientific work in industrial technology with regards to its methodological approach and rigor,
- identify and delineate socially useful and scientifically relevant research questions in industrial technology, and how they should be tackled methodologically to produce relevant knowledge about the chosen problems,
- assess methodological approaches from ethical point of view, and explain the importance of research ethics within scientific methods.
Content
Theoretical assumptions and methodological considerations that are relevant to knowledge production in general and to industrial technology in particular. Theoretical points of departure that a variety of methods rests upon. Analysis and critical examination of scientific knowledge in industrial technology, in light of methodological and ethical considerations. Application of different qualitative and quantitative methods, including statistics, and conducting a research study.
Instruction
Lectures and seminars.
Assessment
Written assignments (2 credits), written exam (2 credits) and active participation in seminars (1 credit).
If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding targeted pedagogical support from the disability coordinator of the university.