Classics of Aesthetics

7.5 credits

Syllabus, Bachelor's level, 5ES069

Code
5ES069
Education cycle
First cycle
Main field(s) of study and in-depth level
Aesthetics G1F
Grading system
Fail (U), Pass (G), Pass with distinction (VG)
Finalised by
The Department Board, 4 September 2023
Responsible department
Department of Philosophy

Entry requirements

22.5 credits from Aesthetics A or 22.5 credits from Practical Philosophy A or 22.5 credits from Theoretical Philosophy A

Learning outcomes

At the completion of the course, students are expected to:

  • be able to use the concepts and distinctions necessary for critical evaluation of philosophical theories and arguments
  • be able to read and understand texts with significant proportions of historical analysis and philosophical argument
  • demonstrate a systematic understanding of a number of problems central to contemporary philosophical aesthetics
  • show very good knowledge of philosophical aesthetics in general
  • be able to analyse strengths and weaknesses in the particular theories studied
  • be able to critically discuss the relations between different aesthetic theories and a selection of works of art that challenge those theories
  • be able to use theoretical tools to argue for and against central theories about aesthetic value, art, and the experience of art.

Content

The focus of this course is the historical development of aesthetics and the questions discussed by, for instance, Plato, Aristotle, Hume, Kant, Schiller and Hutcheson: questions which still today influence philosophical discussions about art and aesthetic experience. How do these historical texts illuminate the concepts and distinctions still central to contemporary aesthetics? How does the development of aesthetics relate to theories and influential developments in other philosophical domains? The particular texts studied each semester are chosen by the course director.

Instruction

Lectures and seminars.

Assessment

The assessment is based upon take-home assignments.

If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding special pedagogical support from the University's disability coordinator.

FOLLOW UPPSALA UNIVERSITY ON

facebook
instagram
twitter
youtube
linkedin