Ontology of Art

7.5 credits

Syllabus, Bachelor's level, 5ES047

Code
5ES047
Education cycle
First cycle
Main field(s) of study and in-depth level
Aesthetics G1F
Grading system
Fail (U), Pass (G), Pass with distinction (VG)
Finalised by
The Department Board, 4 September 2023
Responsible department
Department of Philosophy

Entry requirements

22.5 credits from Aesthetics A or 22.5 credits from Practical Philosophy A or 22.5 credits from Theoretical Philosophy A

Learning outcomes

On completing the course each student will have deepened the knowledge of aesthetics they gained from their previous studies. Each student is expected to:

  • be able to use the concepts and distinctions necessary for the critical evaluation of philosophical theories and arguments
  • be able to read and understand texts with a significant proportion of historical analysis and philosophical argument
  • demonstrate a systematic understanding of a number of problems central to contemporary philosophical aesthetics
  • show basic knowledge of philosophical aesthetics in general
  • be able to analyse strengths and weaknesses in the particular theories studied
  • participate in a critical discussion of the relation between different aesthetic theories and a selection of works of art which might challenge those theories
  • be able to use theoretical tools to argue for and against common theories about art and artistic experience.

Content

The aim of this course is to introduce the students to some of the philosophical questions that arise in connection with the ontology of art. What kind of entities are musical works? Are works of fiction identical to literary texts? What is the relation between a sculpture and the physical material which constitutes it? How does restoration and conservation affect the work? What is the difference between a copy and an original? It may seem natural to think of some artworks primarily as actions whereas others are first and foremost material objects. But should we in fact conceive of all artworks as actions?

Instruction

Teaching consists of lectures and seminars.

Assessment

Examination by take home exams.

If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding special pedagogical support from the University's disability coordinator.

No reading list found.

FOLLOW UPPSALA UNIVERSITY ON

facebook
instagram
twitter
youtube
linkedin